We love to use the term mankind "evolved" from the primates. Mathematically as well as with a high degree of probability this is not true. If mankind evolved from the primates - the apes of the Bonobo and Gorilla - why are there still these species about ??
It is more likely mankind was gene spliced from the apes by an advanced species or civilization hoping to colonize the planet. This is not as far fetched as you might want to initially in YOUR mind believe.
In an article at https://www.nbcnews.com/mach/science/did-another-advanced-species-exist-earth-humans-ncna869856 titled "Did another advanced species exist on Earth before humans?" it cites and references a paper published at Cornell University here => In a mind-bending new paper entitled “The Silurian Hypothesis”[ You can opt out of Google Ads if you are a registered user at /ad-options ]
it simply says as old as mankind is - we will never find absolute proof there was not an advanced civilization responsible for our creation as mankind.
Let us take a few factors into account in accord the paper above.
4 billion years ago Mars likely had water and life on it
Entities living on a planet like Mars due to its 1/4 the gravity of Earth would not be able to stand on Earth for long - the gravity would be far too great
They would likely be tall and thin if humanoid like
In order to inhabit and move to a place like Earth - two things would need to be done - to get a more robust and muscular body, and one that has immunities to the natural microbes and virus and bacteria of the the new world, or their immune system would not let them survive breathing air or stand up here.
At the time the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event/Occurred around 66 million years ago and primates appeared about man appeared as far as we can tell most animal species flourished and became extinct long before the first monkeys and their prosimian ancestors evolved. While the earth is about 4.54 billion years old and the first life dates to at least 3.5 billion years ago, the first primates did not appear until around 50-55 million years ago.
That means apes appeared 50-55 million years ago and so while our ancestors as mankind have been around for about six million years, the modern form of humans only evolved about 200,000 years ago. Civilization as we know it is only about 6,000 years old, and industrialization started in the earnest only in the 1800s.
The problem is "evolution" just does not happen that fast and actually mankind moreso "appeared" than evolved.
One thing is clear - humans act more like monkeys than an intelligent species. Mankind walks upright and has the ability to speak to one another in a language and this is probably teh most detrimental thing to the advancement of mankind.
Of most all the forms of life on the planet Earth monkeys are hard to rain. They are obstinate and can be unpredictable. Sounds like the person next door does it not??
Animated, intelligent, eerily "human," monkeys are among the most fascinating animals on our planet. That's why monkeys would seem to make delightful pets. But, unlike dogs or cats, primates (all monkeys and apes) have not evolved over thousands of years to live compatibly with humans. Monkeys are not domestic pets. They are wild animals ill-equipped to adapt to the alien world of their human cousins. Keeping primates happy and healthy in captivity is difficult, expensive and time-consuming.
As you think about bringing a monkey into your home, please consider the following:
Are you prepared to live with a wild animal?
Never forget that a monkey is a wild animal. Like raccoons, their infant friendliness fades as they reach adulthood, when they become aggressive and can attack with the slightest provocation. Most monkeys you see on television or out in public are very young; adults are rarely seen outside of a cage. Even hand-rearing an infant primate does not stop this natural change in behavior. In fact, depriving a baby monkey of a normal relationship with its mother and family group can result in a lifetime of neurotic behavior.
Can you deal with the mess?
All monkey homes share something in common: broken lamps and housewares, shredded curtains, unearthed house plants - not to mention the unmistakable odor.
Let us "assume" an advanced civilization felt the primate frame would be the best basis to gene splice to - guess what they found out - the intellect level of themselves was polluted and diluted and the intelligence level just did not pass on.
Instead they got a humanoid who refused to be trained and was prone to attack and escape the learning environment to run free.
Lets say the advanced civilization species tried over and over again - producing what we have now found to be tb he "races" of the planet - and each difference between the prior generation were separated by the creators by moving them to another part of the planet to keep them apart and retry again. Genetically a few superior intellect kinds were produced - and it did nothing but create prejudice to the lower previous forms of humanoids. Evidence and historical record shows all of mankind was very aggressive to others especially not looking "like" them. It is still that way to this day Genes are a crapshoot.
The biggest problem and most surprising thing probably was that the female was especially obstinate and driven only to reproduce and copulate.
What kind of civilization would this bother ??
Let us imagine egg layers or even reptilian egg layers of which the actual society educates all members equally and there is no family unit. Hard to imagine - but much of wild life on Earth is this way. Turtles, and snakes and many reptiles lay eggs and leave the young when born to find there way by instinct and fend on their own. As do fish - but not the mammals of the seas. Birds on the other hand raise their younfg only to a certain point and then - out of the nest they must go. The Peregrine Falcon - the fastest animal on the planet teaches its young to hunt at high arial speeds - and then after a small amount of help they are on their own.
Humans on the other hand coddle and care for their young for life. it goes on for generations So long most would say - that the youngers never really have to stand on their own and they cry and return home at a moments notice. They also usually develop the prejudices of the parents good or bad.
In short many times the youngsters resist schooling and wait until they are physically large enough to be adult and then just go out into the world dong whatever they want to do and this is the basis of crime and aberrance in society from theft and lies to sex change operations popular today.
There was a time when one had to actually work and be something to be accepted in society but now - no more.
The problem is men and women hate each other but want what the other has. Women want to be physically larger and able to fight - and men want attention at the drop of hat for how good they look. Both want sex from the other.
Now that brings us back to the egg layers - sex and raising young is not a part of the equation. Sure they are not copulating for pleasure but at the same time the young must survive or perish on their own.
Imagine an advanced civilization reptilian not ready for the aspect of sex, pleasure and the female equation in distracting intellectual advancement.
Historical record shows that some kind of advanced civilization space faring force was here in the planet helping early mankind advance - and then it appears they gave up and left. Watch the History channel's Ancient Aliens from the first season to the current one. At this writing it can be found on dwatchseries.to at https://www1.swatchseries.to/serie/ancient_aliens
You will have to monkey with dodging redirects and ads but when you find one of the domains that have it from the first season - book mark it and then manipulate the browser to change episodes and seasons. Also you will be eating lots of bandwidth to play or download what are usually 300 MB or larger files.
Mankind then adopted the "God" paradigm, a belief that some force or identity from the sky is the father of life. this became Religion - and now mankind talks to the air like it is some kind of power or right thing to do.
There is simply more evidence that some kind of Advanced civilization life was hear and influenced mankind substantially - if not indeed creating it initially.
The truth is the "God" paradigm that as an amorphous entity created mankind with magic is another form of a refusal to think. It is no different than the global warming mindset floating about today that mankind is not causing it.
OK if you are God toter - god bless you.
if we as mankind were to make an intelligent informed choice to settle this planet knowing there are more things on it that can kill us faster than not - we would likely not do it.
If gene spliced to the existing life form and created a species dumber and more combative than ourselves would too would abandon it.
It is more likely that if an advanced civilization did exist before the advent of man - that we are gene spliced from the apes in an attempt to settle the planet and it failed so they left. What they got were slightly more intelligent apes that can talk and fight on a new more unorthodox way they decided to give up on, but because the battle would never be won with the female uninterested in logical learning being the way reproduction is accomplished.
This is not sexist but scientific fact - that can be found and seen in all the research into the female brain starting with the work of Louann Brizendine and forward.
Now we have discovered that Genetics have a HUGE amount of influence on the caliber of the human brain, and that indeed genetic management should be what is being done, yet most governments have made genetic matching - or matchmaking illegal.for either medical or designer reasons.
In essence what is now going on is we are returning to the ways of the monkey world and were are getting "dumber", and a search of " mankind is getting dumber " on the Internet will yield all the ways mankind has adopted and makes ok being less intelligent as if it is OK/ One of this authors favorites with links is at https://www.inc.com/jessica-stillman/we-are-all-getting-dumber-new-science-proves-no-one-is-sure-why.html There are lots more.
For Elon Musk's SpaceX to launch a Tesla Roadster into an orbit about the Sun complete with a manikin in a spacesuit - is - well what it is - https://www.nbcnews.com/mach/science/starman-tesla-roadster-spacex-launched-orbit-have-now-cruised-beyond-ncna931731
Mankind is on its path that will never change as long as we coddle each other and support ridiculousness and have made an industry that surrounds death like life is supposed to never end. Sadly the truth is mankind's behavior would not be one to know what to do if a true global catastrophic event happened on planet earth of which none of us could escape - and at that time the craziness of the human brain would show what it is as a monkey brain running about in circles and screaming. There are plenty of them looming.
In the meantime the moon of Mars - Phobos - appears to have a huge monolith on it. Hmmm. http://www.bbc.com/earth/story/20160923-there-is-a-huge-monolith-on-phobos-one-of-marss-moons
One thing is absolutely mathematically clear, mankind is destroying its own habitat by both the idiocy of over population and climate destruction by its own developed technological means burning fossil fuels.
It took 150,000 years for humans to touch the 1-billion population mark in 1800, and reached 2 billion in 1927. . Today, there are over 7.8 billion of us at this writing in January 2019, on this planet. Of these, 2 billion have been added after 1993 – in the last 24 years. According to the United Nations, our population is expected to reach 9.8 billion by 2050 and 11.2 billion by 2100. And that, many scientists believe, is the maximum carrying capacity of the earth.
The issue isn’t the number of people. If a space to provide shelter is all we were focusing on, there is enough room for all of us. The trouble begins when we start measuring the ecological footprint of this burgeoning population – the amount of biologically productive land and water a person requires for producing the resources it consumes.
The other issue is the quality of life issue as to how and where will these people derive a living since technology is actually taking away jobs.
The Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN believes that some 11% of the globe’s land surface is being used for growing crops at the present. An even bigger area is being employed for livestock grazing. To produce 1 kg of wheat, between 500 and 4,000 liters of water is required. 1 kg of chocolate, meanwhile, requires a whopping 17,196 liters of water. Another 15,415 liters of water go into producing 1 kg of beef, while 1 kg of chicken meat necessitates expending 4,325 liters of water. However, of all the water on Earth, more than 99 percent of Earth's water is unusable by humans and many other living things - only about 0.3 percent of our fresh water is found in the surface water of lakes, rivers and swamps. That is a big problem, because 96 percent of the earth's water is in the Oceans and we cannot drink salt water.
How smart are humans now ??
As the paper at the beginning of this post shows - we cannot prove how far back any Advanced Civilization may have existed or become extinct - but we can say with pretty good certainty that all of mankind's DNA does not look like it was of Earth's origin and mankind appeared on Earth too fast to have evolved from anything already here - but rather gene splicing seems to be more a possibility.
See next https://abuseofprocess.pw/gullible
and see also https://abuseofprocess.pw/Love_and_the_Spark